ispell (and minor modifications)
diff --git a/ssl/ssl_ciph.c b/ssl/ssl_ciph.c
index 04294e2..1cbc288 100644
--- a/ssl/ssl_ciph.c
+++ b/ssl/ssl_ciph.c
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@
{
/*
* We hit something, we cannot deal with,
- * it is no command or seperator nor
+ * it is no command or separator nor
* alphanumeric, so we call this an error.
*/
SSLerr(SSL_F_SSL_CIPHER_PROCESS_RULESTR,
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@
multi=0;
/*
- * Now search for the name in the ca_list. Be carefule
+ * Now search for the name in the ca_list. Be careful
* with the strncmp, because the "buflen" limitation
* will make the rule "ADH:SOME" and the cipher
* "ADH-MY-CIPHER" look like a match for buflen=3.
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@
* There might be two types of entries in the rule_str: 1) names
* of ciphers themselves 2) aliases for groups of ciphers.
* For 1) we need the available ciphers and for 2) the cipher
- * groups of cipher_aliases added togehter in one list (otherwise
+ * groups of cipher_aliases added together in one list (otherwise
* we would be happy with just the cipher_aliases table).
*/
num_of_group_aliases = sizeof(cipher_aliases) / sizeof(SSL_CIPHER);
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@
/*
* Now it is getting really strange. If something failed during
- * the previous pointer assignement or if one of the pointers was
+ * the previous pointer assignment or if one of the pointers was
* not requested, the error condition is met. That might be
* discussable. The strange thing is however that in this case
* the memory "ret" pointed to is "free()ed" and hence the pointer
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@
return("(NONE)");
}
-/* number of bits for symetric cipher */
+/* number of bits for symmetric cipher */
int SSL_CIPHER_get_bits(SSL_CIPHER *c, int *alg_bits)
{
int ret=0;
