CPU Scheduling events

On Android and Linux Perfetto can gather scheduler traces via the Linux Kernel ftrace infrastructure.

This allows to get fine grained scheduling events such as:

• Which threads were scheduling on which CPU cores at any point in time, with nanosecond accuracy.
• The reason why a running thread got descheduled (e.g. pre-emption, blocked on a mutex, blocking syscall or any other wait queue).
• The point in time when a thread became eligible to be executed, even if it was not put immediately on any CPU run queue, together with the source thread that made it executable.

UI

When zoomed out, the UI shows a quantized view of CPU usage, which collapses the scheduling information:

However, by zooming in, the individual scheduling events become visible:

Clicking on a CPU slice shows the relevant information in the details panel:

Scrolling down, when expanding individual processes, the scheduling events also create one track for each thread, which allows to follow the evolution of the state of individual threads:

data_sources {
  config {
    name: "linux.ftrace"
    ftrace_config {
      ftrace_events: "sched/sched_switch"
      ftrace_events: "sched/sched_waking"
    }
  }
}

SQL

At the SQL level, the scheduling data is exposed in the sched_slice table.

select ts, dur, cpu, end_state, priority, process.name, thread.name
from sched_slice left join thread using(utid) left join process using(upid)

ts	dur	cpu	end_state	priority	process.name,	thread.name
261187012170995	247188	2	S	130	/system/bin/logd	logd.klogd
261187012418183	12812	2	D	120	/system/bin/traced_probes	traced_probes0
261187012421099	220000	4	D	120	kthreadd	kworker/u16:2
261187012430995	72396	2	D	120	/system/bin/traced_probes	traced_probes1
261187012454537	13958	0	D	120	/system/bin/traced_probes	traced_probes0
261187012460318	46354	3	S	120	/system/bin/traced_probes	traced_probes2
261187012468495	10625	0	R	120	[NULL]	swapper/0
261187012479120	6459	0	D	120	/system/bin/traced_probes	traced_probes0
261187012485579	7760	0	R	120	[NULL]	swapper/0
261187012493339	34896	0	D	120	/system/bin/traced_probes	traced_probes0

TraceConfig

data_sources: {
    config {
        name: "linux.ftrace"
        ftrace_config {
            ftrace_events: "sched/sched_switch"
            ftrace_events: "sched/sched_process_exit"
            ftrace_events: "sched/sched_process_free"
            ftrace_events: "task/task_newtask"
            ftrace_events: "task/task_rename"
        }
    }
}

# This is to get full process name and thread<>process relationships.
data_sources: {
    config {
        name: "linux.process_stats"
    }
}

Scheduling wakeups and latency analysis

By further enabling the following in the TraceConfig, the ftrace data source will record also scheduling wake up events:

  ftrace_events: "sched/sched_wakeup_new"
  ftrace_events: "sched/sched_waking"

While sched_switch events are emitted only when a thread is in the R(unnable) state AND is running on a CPU run queue, sched_waking events are emitted when any event causes a thread state to change.

Consider the following example:

Thread A
condition_variable.wait()
                                     Thread B
                                     condition_variable.notify()

When Thread A suspends on the wait() it will enter the state S(sleeping) and get removed from the CPU run queue. When Thread B notifies the variable, the kernel will transition Thread A into the R(unnable) state. Thread A at that point is eligible to be put back on a run queue. However this might not happen for some time because, for instance:

• All CPUs might be busy running some other thread, and Thread A needs to wait to get a run queue slot assigned (or the other threads have higher priority).
• Some other CPUs other than the current one, but the scheduler load balancer might take some time to move the thread on another CPU.

Unless using real-time thread priorities, most Linux Kernel scheduler configurations are not strictly work-conserving. For instance the scheduler might prefer to wait some time in the hope that the thread running on the current CPU goes to idle, avoiding a cross-cpu migration which might be more costly both in terms of overhead and power.

NOTE: sched_waking and sched_wakeup provide nearly the same information. The difference lies in wakeup events across CPUs, which involve inter-processor interrupts. The former is emitted on the source (wakee) CPU, the latter on the destination (waked) CPU. sched_waking is usually sufficient for latency analysis, unless you are looking into breaking down latency due to inter-processor signaling.

When enabling sched_waking events, the following will appear in the UI when selecting a CPU slice: