| # Service-based model | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | ## Service | 
 |  | 
 | The tracing service is a long-lived entity (a system daemon on Linux/Android, | 
 | a service in Chrome) that has the following responsibilities: | 
 |  | 
 | * Maintains a registry of active producers and their data sources. | 
 | * Owns the trace buffers. | 
 | * Handles multiplexing of several tracing sessions. | 
 | * Routes the trace config from the consumers to the corresponding producers. | 
 | * Tells the Producers when and what to trace. | 
 | * Moves data from the Producer's shared memory buffer to the central non-shared | 
 |   trace buffers. | 
 |  | 
 | ## Producer | 
 |  | 
 | A producer is an untrusted entity that offers the ability to contribute to the | 
 | trace. In a multiprocess model, a producer almost always corresponds to a client | 
 | process of the tracing service. It advertises its ability to contribute to the trace with one or more data sources. | 
 | Each producer has exactly: | 
 |  | 
 | * One shared memory buffer, shared exclusively with the tracing service. | 
 | * One IPC channel with the tracing service. | 
 |  | 
 | A producer is completely decoupled (both technically and conceptually) from | 
 | consumer(s). A producer knows nothing about: | 
 |  | 
 | * How many consumer(s) are connected to the service. | 
 | * How many tracing sessions are active. | 
 | * How many other producer(s) are registered or active. | 
 | * Trace data written by other producer(s). | 
 |  | 
 | NOTE: In rare circumstances a process can host more than one producer and hence more | 
 | than one shared memory buffer. This can be the case for a process bundling | 
 | third-party libraries that in turn include the Perfetto client library.   | 
 | Concrete example: at some point in the future Chrome might expose one Producer for tracing within the main project, one for V8 and one for Skia (for each child | 
 | process). | 
 |  | 
 | ## Consumer | 
 | A consumer is a trusted entity (a cmdline client on Linux/Android, an interface | 
 | of the Browser process in Chrome) that controls (non-exclusively) the tracing service and reads back (destructively) the trace buffers. | 
 | A consumer has the ability to: | 
 | * Send a [trace config](#) to the service, determining: | 
 |  * How many trace buffers to create. | 
 |  * How big the trace buffers should be. | 
 |  * The policy for each buffer (*ring-buffer* or *stop-when-full*). | 
 |  * Which data sources to enable. | 
 |  * The configuration for each data source. | 
 |  * The target buffer for the data produced by each data source configured. | 
 | * Enable and disable tracing. | 
 | * Read back the trace buffers: | 
 |   * Streaming data over the IPC channel. | 
 |   * Passing a file descriptor to the service and instructing it to periodically | 
 |     save the trace buffers into the file. | 
 |  | 
 | ## Data source | 
 |  | 
 | A data source is a capability, exposed by a Producer, of providing some tracing | 
 | data. A data source almost always defines its own schema (a protobuf) consisting | 
 | of: | 
 | * At most one `DataSourceConfig` sub-message: | 
 |  | 
 |   ([example](/protos/perfetto/config/ftrace/ftrace_config.proto)) | 
 | * One or more `TracePacket` sub-messages | 
 |   ([example](/protos/perfetto/trace/ps/process_tree.proto)) | 
 |  | 
 | Different producers may expose the same data source. Concrete example: | 
 | *** aside | 
 | At some point in the near future we might offer, as part of Perfetto, a library | 
 | for in-process heap profiling. In such case more than one producer, linking | 
 | against the updated Perfetto library, will expose the heap profiler data source, | 
 | for its own process. | 
 | ** | 
 |  | 
 | ## IPC channel | 
 | In a multiprocess scenario, each producer and each consumer interact with the | 
 | service using an IPC channel. IPC is used only in non-fast-path interactions, | 
 | mostly handshakes such as enabling/disabling trace (consumer), (un)registering | 
 | and starting/stopping data sources (producer). The IPC is typically NOT employed | 
 | to transport the protobufs for the trace. | 
 | Perfetto provides a POSIX-friendly IPC implementation, based on protobufs over a | 
 | UNIX socket (see | 
 | [Socket protocol](/docs/design-docs/api-and-abi#socket-protocol)). | 
 |  | 
 | That IPC implementation is not mandated. Perfetto allows the embedder: | 
 |  | 
 | * Wrap its own IPC subsystem (e.g., Perfetto in Chromium uses Mojo) | 
 | * Not use an IPC mechanism at all and just short circuit the | 
 |   Producer <> Service <> Consumer interaction via `PostTask(s)`. | 
 |  | 
 | ## Shared memory buffer | 
 | Producer(s) write tracing data, in the form of protobuf-encoded binary blobs, | 
 | directly into its shared memory buffer, using a special library called | 
 | [ProtoZero](/docs/design-docs/protozero.md). The shared memory buffer: | 
 |  | 
 | * Has a fixed and typically small size (configurable, default: 128 KB). | 
 | * Is an ABI and must maintain backwards compatibility. | 
 | * Is shared by all data sources of the producer. | 
 | * Is independent of the number and the size of the trace buffers. | 
 | * Is independent of the number of Consumer(s). | 
 | * Is partitioned in *chunks* of variable size. | 
 |  | 
 | Each chunk: | 
 |  | 
 | * Is owned exclusively by one Producer thread (or shared through a mutex). | 
 | * Contains a linear sequence of `TracePacket(s)`, or | 
 |   fragments of that. A `TracePacket` can span across several chunks, the | 
 |   fragmentation is not exposed to the consumers (consumers always see whole | 
 |   packets as if they were never fragmented). | 
 | * Can be owned and written by exactly one `TraceWriter`. | 
 | * Is part of a reliable and ordered sequence, identified by the `WriterID`: | 
 |   packets in a sequence are guaranteed to be read back in order, without gaps | 
 |   and without repetitions. | 
 |  | 
 | See the comments in | 
 | [shared_memory_abi.h](/include/perfetto/ext/tracing/core/shared_memory_abi.h) | 
 | for more details about the binary format of this buffer. |