| // Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format |
| // Copyright 2008 Google Inc. All rights reserved. |
| // |
| // Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style |
| // license that can be found in the LICENSE file or at |
| // https://developers.google.com/open-source/licenses/bsd |
| |
| #include <gtest/gtest.h> |
| #include "google/protobuf/descriptor.h" |
| #include "google/protobuf/dynamic_message.h" |
| #include "google/protobuf/unittest.pb.h" |
| #include "google/protobuf/unittest_preserve_unknown_enum.pb.h" |
| #include "google/protobuf/unittest_preserve_unknown_enum2.pb.h" |
| |
| namespace google { |
| namespace protobuf { |
| namespace { |
| |
| void FillMessage( |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra* message) { |
| message->set_e(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA); |
| message->add_repeated_e(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA); |
| message->add_repeated_packed_e( |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA); |
| message->add_repeated_packed_unexpected_e( |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA); |
| message->set_oneof_e_1(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA); |
| } |
| |
| void CheckMessage( |
| const proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra& message) { |
| EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA, message.e()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_e_size()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA, |
| message.repeated_e(0)); |
| EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_e_size()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA, |
| message.repeated_packed_e(0)); |
| EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_unexpected_e_size()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA, |
| message.repeated_packed_unexpected_e(0)); |
| EXPECT_EQ(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA, |
| message.oneof_e_1()); |
| } |
| |
| void CheckMessage( |
| const proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage& message) { |
| EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA), |
| static_cast<int>(message.e())); |
| EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_e_size()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA), |
| static_cast<int>(message.repeated_e(0))); |
| EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_e_size()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA), |
| static_cast<int>(message.repeated_packed_e(0))); |
| EXPECT_EQ(1, message.repeated_packed_unexpected_e_size()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA), |
| static_cast<int>(message.repeated_packed_unexpected_e(0))); |
| EXPECT_EQ(static_cast<int>(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA), |
| static_cast<int>(message.oneof_e_1())); |
| } |
| |
| } // anonymous namespace |
| |
| // Test that parsing preserves an unknown value in the enum field and does not |
| // punt it to the UnknownFieldSet. |
| TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, PreserveParseAndSerialize) { |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message; |
| FillMessage(&orig_message); |
| std::string serialized; |
| orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized); |
| |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message; |
| EXPECT_EQ(true, message.ParseFromString(serialized)); |
| CheckMessage(message); |
| |
| serialized.clear(); |
| message.SerializeToString(&serialized); |
| EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized)); |
| CheckMessage(orig_message); |
| } |
| |
| // Test that reflection based implementation also keeps unknown enum values and |
| // doesn't put them into UnknownFieldSet. |
| TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, PreserveParseAndSerializeDynamicMessage) { |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message; |
| FillMessage(&orig_message); |
| std::string serialized = orig_message.SerializeAsString(); |
| |
| DynamicMessageFactory factory; |
| std::unique_ptr<Message> message( |
| factory |
| .GetPrototype( |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage::descriptor()) |
| ->New()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(true, message->ParseFromString(serialized)); |
| message->DiscardUnknownFields(); |
| |
| serialized = message->SerializeAsString(); |
| EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized)); |
| CheckMessage(orig_message); |
| } |
| |
| // Test that for proto2 messages, unknown values are in unknown fields. |
| TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, Proto2HidesUnknownValues) { |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message; |
| FillMessage(&orig_message); |
| |
| std::string serialized; |
| orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized); |
| |
| proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message; |
| EXPECT_EQ(true, message.ParseFromString(serialized)); |
| // The intermediate message has everything in its "unknown fields". |
| proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message2 = message; |
| message2.DiscardUnknownFields(); |
| EXPECT_EQ(0, message2.ByteSizeLong()); |
| |
| // But when we pass it to the correct structure, all values are there. |
| serialized.clear(); |
| message.SerializeToString(&serialized); |
| EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized)); |
| CheckMessage(orig_message); |
| } |
| |
| // Same as before, for a dynamic message. |
| TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, DynamicProto2HidesUnknownValues) { |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message; |
| FillMessage(&orig_message); |
| |
| std::string serialized; |
| orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized); |
| |
| DynamicMessageFactory factory; |
| std::unique_ptr<Message> message( |
| factory |
| .GetPrototype( |
| proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage::descriptor()) |
| ->New()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(true, message->ParseFromString(serialized)); |
| // The intermediate message has everything in its "unknown fields". |
| proto2_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message2; |
| message2.CopyFrom(*message); |
| message2.DiscardUnknownFields(); |
| EXPECT_EQ(0, message2.ByteSizeLong()); |
| |
| // But when we pass it to the correct structure, all values are there. |
| serialized.clear(); |
| message->SerializeToString(&serialized); |
| EXPECT_EQ(true, orig_message.ParseFromString(serialized)); |
| CheckMessage(orig_message); |
| } |
| |
| // Test that reflection provides EnumValueDescriptors for unknown values. |
| TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, DynamicEnumValueDescriptors) { |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessagePlusExtra orig_message; |
| FillMessage(&orig_message); |
| std::string serialized; |
| orig_message.SerializeToString(&serialized); |
| |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message; |
| EXPECT_EQ(true, message.ParseFromString(serialized)); |
| CheckMessage(message); |
| |
| const Reflection* r = message.GetReflection(); |
| const Descriptor* d = message.GetDescriptor(); |
| const FieldDescriptor* field = d->FindFieldByName("e"); |
| |
| // This should dynamically create an EnumValueDescriptor. |
| const EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value = r->GetEnum(message, field); |
| EXPECT_EQ(enum_value->number(), |
| static_cast<int>(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA)); |
| |
| // Fetching value for a second time should return the same pointer. |
| const EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value_second = r->GetEnum(message, field); |
| EXPECT_EQ(enum_value, enum_value_second); |
| |
| // Check the repeated case too. |
| const FieldDescriptor* repeated_field = d->FindFieldByName("repeated_e"); |
| enum_value = r->GetRepeatedEnum(message, repeated_field, 0); |
| EXPECT_EQ(enum_value->number(), |
| static_cast<int>(proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::E_EXTRA)); |
| // Should reuse the same EnumValueDescriptor, even for a different field. |
| EXPECT_EQ(enum_value, enum_value_second); |
| |
| // We should be able to use the returned value descriptor to set a value on |
| // another message. |
| Message* m = message.New(); |
| r->SetEnum(m, field, enum_value); |
| EXPECT_EQ(enum_value, r->GetEnum(*m, field)); |
| delete m; |
| } |
| |
| // Test that the new integer-based enum reflection API works. |
| TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, IntegerEnumReflectionAPI) { |
| proto3_preserve_unknown_enum_unittest::MyMessage message; |
| const Reflection* r = message.GetReflection(); |
| const Descriptor* d = message.GetDescriptor(); |
| |
| const FieldDescriptor* singular_field = d->FindFieldByName("e"); |
| const FieldDescriptor* repeated_field = d->FindFieldByName("repeated_e"); |
| |
| r->SetEnumValue(&message, singular_field, 42); |
| EXPECT_EQ(42, r->GetEnumValue(message, singular_field)); |
| r->AddEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 42); |
| r->AddEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 42); |
| EXPECT_EQ(42, r->GetRepeatedEnumValue(message, repeated_field, 0)); |
| r->SetRepeatedEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 1, 84); |
| EXPECT_EQ(84, r->GetRepeatedEnumValue(message, repeated_field, 1)); |
| const EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value = r->GetEnum(message, singular_field); |
| EXPECT_EQ(42, enum_value->number()); |
| } |
| |
| // Test that the EnumValue API works properly for proto2 messages as well. |
| TEST(PreserveUnknownEnumTest, Proto2CatchesUnknownValues) { |
| protobuf_unittest::TestAllTypes message; // proto2 message |
| const Reflection* r = message.GetReflection(); |
| const Descriptor* d = message.GetDescriptor(); |
| const FieldDescriptor* repeated_field = |
| d->FindFieldByName("repeated_nested_enum"); |
| // Add one element to the repeated field so that we can test |
| // SetRepeatedEnumValue. |
| const EnumValueDescriptor* enum_value = |
| repeated_field->enum_type()->FindValueByName("BAR"); |
| EXPECT_TRUE(enum_value != nullptr); |
| r->AddEnum(&message, repeated_field, enum_value); |
| |
| const FieldDescriptor* singular_field = |
| d->FindFieldByName("optional_nested_enum"); |
| // Enum-field integer-based setters treat as unknown integer values as |
| // unknown fields. |
| r->SetEnumValue(&message, singular_field, 4242); |
| EXPECT_EQ(r->GetEnum(message, singular_field)->number(), |
| protobuf_unittest::TestAllTypes::FOO); |
| r->SetRepeatedEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 0, 4242); |
| // repeated_nested_enum was set to bar above, this should not have changed. |
| EXPECT_EQ(r->GetRepeatedEnum(message, repeated_field, 0)->number(), |
| protobuf_unittest::TestAllTypes::BAR); |
| r->AddEnumValue(&message, repeated_field, 4242); |
| // No element should be added |
| EXPECT_EQ(message.repeated_nested_enum_size(), 1); |
| |
| // We require the enums to end up in unknown field set |
| ASSERT_EQ(message.unknown_fields().field_count(), 3); |
| EXPECT_EQ(message.unknown_fields().field(0).number(), |
| singular_field->number()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(message.unknown_fields().field(0).varint(), 4242); |
| EXPECT_EQ(message.unknown_fields().field(1).number(), |
| repeated_field->number()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(message.unknown_fields().field(1).varint(), 4242); |
| EXPECT_EQ(message.unknown_fields().field(2).number(), |
| repeated_field->number()); |
| EXPECT_EQ(message.unknown_fields().field(2).varint(), 4242); |
| } |
| |
| } // namespace protobuf |
| } // namespace google |