objectivec/GPBFieldMask.pbobjc.h - third_party/protobuf - Git at Google

 // Generated by the protocol buffer compiler.  DO NOT EDIT!
 // clang-format off
 // source: google/protobuf/field_mask.proto

 #import "GPBDescriptor.h"
 #import "GPBMessage.h"
 #import "GPBRootObject.h"

 #if GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_OBJC_VERSION < 30007
 #error This file was generated by a newer version of protoc which is incompatible with your Protocol Buffer library sources.
 #endif
 #if 30007 < GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_OBJC_MIN_SUPPORTED_VERSION
 #error This file was generated by an older version of protoc which is incompatible with your Protocol Buffer library sources.
 #endif

 // @@protoc_insertion_point(imports)

 #pragma clang diagnostic push
 #pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"

 CF_EXTERN_C_BEGIN

 NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_BEGIN

 #pragma mark - GPBFieldMaskRoot

 /**
  * Exposes the extension registry for this file.
  *
  * The base class provides:
  * @code
  *   + (GPBExtensionRegistry *)extensionRegistry;
  * @endcode
  * which is a @c GPBExtensionRegistry that includes all the extensions defined by
  * this file and all files that it depends on.
  **/
 GPB_FINAL @interface GPBFieldMaskRoot : GPBRootObject
 @end

 #pragma mark - GPBFieldMask

 typedef GPB_ENUM(GPBFieldMask_FieldNumber) {
   GPBFieldMask_FieldNumber_PathsArray = 1,
 };

 /**
  * `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
  *
  *     paths: "f.a"
  *     paths: "f.b.d"
  *
  * Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
  * fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
  * message in `f.b`.
  *
  * Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
  * returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
  * Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
  *
  * # Field Masks in Projections
  *
  * When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
  * sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
  * specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
  * example is applied to a response message as follows:
  *
  *     f {
  *       a : 22
  *       b {
  *         d : 1
  *         x : 2
  *       }
  *       y : 13
  *     }
  *     z: 8
  *
  * The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
  * (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
  * output):
  *
  *
  *     f {
  *       a : 22
  *       b {
  *         d : 1
  *       }
  *     }
  *
  * A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
  * paths string.
  *
  * If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
  * operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
  * had been specified).
  *
  * Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
  * top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
  * field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
  * list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
  * in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
  * other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
  * clearly documented together with its declaration in the API.  In
  * any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
  * behavior for APIs.
  *
  * # Field Masks in Update Operations
  *
  * A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
  * targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
  * to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
  * and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
  * describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
  * fields not covered by the mask.
  *
  * If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
  * be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
  * a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
  *
  * If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
  * update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
  * in the target resource.
  *
  * For example, given the target message:
  *
  *     f {
  *       b {
  *         d: 1
  *         x: 2
  *       }
  *       c: [1]
  *     }
  *
  * And an update message:
  *
  *     f {
  *       b {
  *         d: 10
  *       }
  *       c: [2]
  *     }
  *
  * then if the field mask is:
  *
  *  paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
  *
  * then the result will be:
  *
  *     f {
  *       b {
  *         d: 10
  *         x: 2
  *       }
  *       c: [1, 2]
  *     }
  *
  * An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
  * repeated and message fields.
  *
  * In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
  * be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
  * Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
  * instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
  * not provide a mask as described below.
  *
  * If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
  * all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
  * Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
  * fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
  * the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
  * behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
  * a field mask, producing an error if not.
  *
  * As with get operations, the location of the resource which
  * describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
  * operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
  * required to be honored by the API.
  *
  * ## Considerations for HTTP REST
  *
  * The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
  * be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
  * (PUT must only be used for full updates).
  *
  * # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
  *
  * In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
  * separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
  * to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
  *
  * As an example, consider the following message declarations:
  *
  *     message Profile {
  *       User user = 1;
  *       Photo photo = 2;
  *     }
  *     message User {
  *       string display_name = 1;
  *       string address = 2;
  *     }
  *
  * In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
  *
  *     mask {
  *       paths: "user.display_name"
  *       paths: "photo"
  *     }
  *
  * In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
  *
  *     {
  *       mask: "user.displayName,photo"
  *     }
  *
  * # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
  *
  * Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
  * following message:
  *
  *     message SampleMessage {
  *       oneof test_oneof {
  *         string name = 4;
  *         SubMessage sub_message = 9;
  *       }
  *     }
  *
  * The field mask can be:
  *
  *     mask {
  *       paths: "name"
  *     }
  *
  * Or:
  *
  *     mask {
  *       paths: "sub_message"
  *     }
  *
  * Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
  * paths.
  *
  * ## Field Mask Verification
  *
  * The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
  * request should verify the included field paths, and return an
  * `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is unmappable.
  **/
 GPB_FINAL @interface GPBFieldMask : GPBMessage

 /** The set of field mask paths. */
 @property(nonatomic, readwrite, strong, null_resettable) NSMutableArray<NSString*> *pathsArray;
 /** The number of items in @c pathsArray without causing the container to be created. */
 @property(nonatomic, readonly) NSUInteger pathsArray_Count;

 @end

 NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_END

 CF_EXTERN_C_END

 #pragma clang diagnostic pop

 // @@protoc_insertion_point(global_scope)

 // clang-format on
	// Generated by the protocol buffer compiler. DO NOT EDIT!
	// clang-format off
	// source: google/protobuf/field_mask.proto

	#import "GPBDescriptor.h"
	#import "GPBMessage.h"
	#import "GPBRootObject.h"

	#if GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_OBJC_VERSION < 30007
	#error This file was generated by a newer version of protoc which is incompatible with your Protocol Buffer library sources.
	#endif
	#if 30007 < GOOGLE_PROTOBUF_OBJC_MIN_SUPPORTED_VERSION
	#error This file was generated by an older version of protoc which is incompatible with your Protocol Buffer library sources.
	#endif

	// @@protoc_insertion_point(imports)

	#pragma clang diagnostic push
	#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations"

	CF_EXTERN_C_BEGIN

	NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_BEGIN

	#pragma mark - GPBFieldMaskRoot

	/**
	* Exposes the extension registry for this file.
	*
	* The base class provides:
	* @code
	* + (GPBExtensionRegistry *)extensionRegistry;
	* @endcode
	* which is a @c GPBExtensionRegistry that includes all the extensions defined by
	* this file and all files that it depends on.
	**/
	GPB_FINAL @interface GPBFieldMaskRoot : GPBRootObject
	@end

	#pragma mark - GPBFieldMask

	typedef GPB_ENUM(GPBFieldMask_FieldNumber) {
	GPBFieldMask_FieldNumber_PathsArray = 1,
	};

	/**
	* `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
	*
	* paths: "f.a"
	* paths: "f.b.d"
	*
	* Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
	* fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
	* message in `f.b`.
	*
	* Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
	* returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
	* Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
	*
	* # Field Masks in Projections
	*
	* When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
	* sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
	* specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
	* example is applied to a response message as follows:
	*
	* f {
	* a : 22
	* b {
	* d : 1
	* x : 2
	* }
	* y : 13
	* }
	* z: 8
	*
	* The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
	* (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
	* output):
	*
	*
	* f {
	* a : 22
	* b {
	* d : 1
	* }
	* }
	*
	* A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
	* paths string.
	*
	* If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
	* operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
	* had been specified).
	*
	* Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
	* top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
	* field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
	* list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
	* in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
	* other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
	* clearly documented together with its declaration in the API. In
	* any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
	* behavior for APIs.
	*
	* # Field Masks in Update Operations
	*
	* A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
	* targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
	* to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
	* and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
	* describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
	* fields not covered by the mask.
	*
	* If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
	* be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
	* a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
	*
	* If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
	* update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
	* in the target resource.
	*
	* For example, given the target message:
	*
	* f {
	* b {
	* d: 1
	* x: 2
	* }
	* c: [1]
	* }
	*
	* And an update message:
	*
	* f {
	* b {
	* d: 10
	* }
	* c: [2]
	* }
	*
	* then if the field mask is:
	*
	* paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
	*
	* then the result will be:
	*
	* f {
	* b {
	* d: 10
	* x: 2
	* }
	* c: [1, 2]
	* }
	*
	* An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
	* repeated and message fields.
	*
	* In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
	* be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
	* Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
	* instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
	* not provide a mask as described below.
	*
	* If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
	* all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
	* Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
	* fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
	* the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
	* behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
	* a field mask, producing an error if not.
	*
	* As with get operations, the location of the resource which
	* describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
	* operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
	* required to be honored by the API.
	*
	* ## Considerations for HTTP REST
	*
	* The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
	* be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
	* (PUT must only be used for full updates).
	*
	* # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
	*
	* In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
	* separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
	* to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
	*
	* As an example, consider the following message declarations:
	*
	* message Profile {
	* User user = 1;
	* Photo photo = 2;
	* }
	* message User {
	* string display_name = 1;
	* string address = 2;
	* }
	*
	* In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
	*
	* mask {
	* paths: "user.display_name"
	* paths: "photo"
	* }
	*
	* In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
	*
	* {
	* mask: "user.displayName,photo"
	* }
	*
	* # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
	*
	* Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
	* following message:
	*
	* message SampleMessage {
	* oneof test_oneof {
	* string name = 4;
	* SubMessage sub_message = 9;
	* }
	* }
	*
	* The field mask can be:
	*
	* mask {
	* paths: "name"
	* }
	*
	* Or:
	*
	* mask {
	* paths: "sub_message"
	* }
	*
	* Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
	* paths.
	*
	* ## Field Mask Verification
	*
	* The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
	* request should verify the included field paths, and return an
	* `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is unmappable.
	**/
	GPB_FINAL @interface GPBFieldMask : GPBMessage

	/** The set of field mask paths. */
	@property(nonatomic, readwrite, strong, null_resettable) NSMutableArray<NSString> pathsArray;
	/** The number of items in @c pathsArray without causing the container to be created. */
	@property(nonatomic, readonly) NSUInteger pathsArray_Count;

	@end

	NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_END

	CF_EXTERN_C_END

	#pragma clang diagnostic pop

	// @@protoc_insertion_point(global_scope)

	// clang-format on